pyphi.examples#
Example substrates and systems to go along with the documentation.
Functions
The three-candidate, seven-voter election of Albantakis et al. (2019), Fig 11: voters |
|
The actual causation example substrate, consisting of an |
|
Based on the basic_substrate, but with added selfloops and noisy edges. |
|
A system containing all the nodes of the |
|
The state of nodes in |
|
|
A 3-node substrate of logic gates. |
A system containing all the nodes of the |
|
A micro-substrate to demonstrate blackboxing. |
|
A system of two general logic gates A and B such if they are in the same state they stay the same, but if they are in different states, they flip with probability 50%. |
|
A system of three general logic gates A, B and C such that: if A and B are in the same state then they stay the same; if they are in different states, they flip if C is ON and stay the same if C is OFF; and C is ON 50% of the time, independent of the previous state. |
|
|
|
|
|
The disjunction-conjunction example from Actual Causation Figure 9. |
|
The substrate shown in Figures 4, 6, 8, 9 and 10 of the 2014 IIT 3.0 paper. |
|
The substrate shown in Figure 1A of the 2014 IIT 3.0 paper. |
|
The ABCDEFG portion of the substrate shown in Figure 16 of the 2014 IIT 3.0 paper. |
|
The substrate shown in Figure 1A of the 2014 IIT 3.0 paper. |
|
The substrate shown in Figure 3A of the 2014 IIT 3.0 paper. |
|
The substrate shown in Figure 3B of the 2014 IIT 3.0 paper. |
|
The substrate shown in Figures 4, 6, 8, 9 and 10 of the 2014 IIT 3.0 paper. |
|
The substrate shown in Figure 5A of the 2014 IIT 3.0 paper. |
|
The substrate shown in Figure 5B of the 2014 IIT 3.0 paper. |
|
The substrate shown in Figures 4, 6, 8, 9 and 10 of the 2014 IIT 3.0 paper. |
|
The substrate shown in Figures 4, 6, 8, 9 and 10 of the 2014 IIT 3.0 paper. |
|
The substrate shown in Figures 4, 6, 8, 9 and 10 of the 2014 IIT 3.0 paper. |
|
|
The substrate of a frog from Grasso et al. (2021). |
|
The state transition analyzed for a frog from Grasso et al. (2021). |
The multi-valued p53-Mdm2 regulatory network from Gómez et al. (2020). |
|
3-node grid substrate. |
|
The 3-unit logistic substrate of Fig 1A. |
|
The 6-unit "bottleneck" architecture of Fig 6A. |
|
The 6-unit "modular" architecture of Fig 6B. |
|
The 6-unit "copy" architecture of Fig 6C. |
|
The 6-unit "specialized" architecture of Fig 6D. |
|
The 6-unit "structured" architecture of Fig 6E. |
|
The Fig 7 network with unit E inactivated (Fig 7C). |
|
The 5-unit state-dependent network of Fig 7. |
|
A substrate of micro elements which has greater integrated information after coarse graining to a macro scale. |
|
A system containing all the nodes of |
|
|
The four-unit systems of Marshall et al. (2023), Fig 1. |
|
The four-unit sigmoid systems of Marshall et al. (2023), Fig 2. |
|
The eight-unit universe of Marshall et al. (2023), Fig 3. |
A single binary unit that keeps its state with probability |
|
|
A 3-node substrate of logic gates. |
A system containing all the nodes of the |
|
The |
|
A version of the primary example from the IIT 3.0 paper with deterministic COPY gates on each connection. |
|
|
Register an example function in |
The substrate for the residue example. |
|
The system containing all the nodes of the |
|
A substrate of three elements which follows the logic of the Rule 110 cellular automaton with current and previous state (0, 0, 0). |
|
A substrate of five elements which follows the logic of the Rule 154 cellular automaton. |
|
A fully connected system of three XOR gates. |
|
The system containing all the nodes of the |